[1]刘涤源,王诚.“两个剑桥之争”述评(上)[J].成都:财经科学,1994(06):35-38.
[2]刘涤源,王诚.“两个剑桥之争”述评(中)[J].成都:财经科学,1995(01):39-44.
[3]刘涤源,王诚.“两个剑桥之争”述评(下)[J].成都:财经科学,1995(02):56-59.
[4]张凤林等.后凯恩斯经济学新进展追踪评析[M].北京:商务印书馆2013:24-29.
[5]Harcourt G C. Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1972:47.
[6]Cohen A J, Harcourt G C. Retrospectives: whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies?[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, 17(1): 199-214.
[7]Yew‐Kwang, Ng. The Neoclassical and the Neo‐Marxist‐Keynesian Theories of Income Distribution: A Non‐Cambridge Contribution to the Cambridge Controversy in Capital Theory[J]. Australian Economic Papers, 1974, 13(22): 124-132.
[8]Culllenberg S, Dasgupta I. From Myth to Metaphor: A Semiological Analysis of the Cambridge Capital Controversy.WorkingPaper,Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, 2000.
[9]刘涤源,傅殷才.后凯恩斯学派中的“两个剑桥之争”[J].武汉:武汉大学学报(社会科学版),1982(5):43-49.
[10]刘涤源,傅殷才.后凯恩斯学派中的“两个剑桥之争”(续完)[J].武汉:武汉大学学报(社会科学版),1982(6):66-70.
[11]平新乔,刘伟.均衡与非均衡:两个剑桥之争的实质[J].北京:经济科学,1989(3):59-66.
[12]曹剑,林铁铮.“剑桥资本争论”的回顾与展望[J].天津:天津商学院学报,2006,26(5):9-14.
[13]郭金兴.剑桥资本争论的终结:“悖论”以及一个方法论的解释[J].合肥:江淮论坛,2007,225(5):5.
[14]柳欣.剑桥资本争论之谜——实物还是货币,技术关系还是社会关系[J].上海:学术月刊,2012(10):62-71.
[15]Keynes J M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money[M]. Palgrave Macmillan, 1936:215.
[16]Harrod R F. An Essay in Dynamic Theory[J]. The Economic Journal, 1939, 49(193): 14-33.
[17]Solow R M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, 70(1): 65-94.
[18]Robinson J. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1953, 21(2): 81-106.
[19]Kaldor N. Alternative Theories of Distribution[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1955, 23(2): 83-100.
[20]Samuelson P A. Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: the Surrogate Production Function[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1962, 29(3): 193-206.
[21]Sraffa P. Production of Commodities: a Comment[J]. The Economic Journal, 1962: 477-479.
[22]Samuelson P A. A Summing Up[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80(4): 568-583.
[23]Levhari D. A Nonsubstitution Theorem and Switching of Techniques[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1965: 98-105.
[24]Pasinetti L L. Paradoxes in Capital Theory: A Symposium: Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80(4): 503-517.
[25]Levhari D, Samuelson P A. The Nonswitching Theorem is False[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80(4): 518-519.
[26]Pasinetti L L. Switches of Technique and the" Rate of Return" in Capital Theory[J]. The Economic Journal, 1969, 79(315): 508-531.
[27]Bliss C.J, Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income[M].North-Holland,1975: 169-195.
[28]Hahn, Frank H. “General Equilibrium Theory,” in The Crisis in Economic Theory[M]. D. Belland I. Kristol, eds. New York: Basic Books, 1981.:pp.123–138.
[29]Stiglitz J E. The Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy in the Theory of Capital; a View from New Haven: a Review Article[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82(4): 893-903.
[30]Sraffa P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory[M]. London: Cambridge University. Press, 1960:11.
[31]Pasinetti L L. Lectures on the Theory of Production[M]. Columbia University Press, 1977:89-91.
[32]Schumpeter J A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy[M]. New York; London: Harper & Brothe., 1942:21-44.
[33]庞巴维克.资本与利息[M].何昆曾,高德超译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:376-404.
[34]斯蒂德曼. 按照斯拉法思想研究马克思[M]. 吴剑敏等译.北京: 商务印书馆, 1991.
[35]Samuelson P A. The Normative and Positivistic Inferiority of Marx's Values Paradigm[J]. Southern Economic Journal, 1982: 11-18.
[36]Samuelson P A. Sraffa's other leg[J]. The Economic Journal, 1991, 101(406): 570-574.
[37]Samuelson P A. A Ricardo-Sraffa Paradigm Comparing Gains from Trade in Inputs and Finished Goods[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39(4): 1204-1214.
[38]Bliss C, Cohen A. Capital Theory[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005:1-15.
[39]Blaug M. The Trade-off Between Rigor and Relevance: Sraffian Economics as a Case in Point[J]. History of Political Economy, 2009, 41(2): 219-247.
[40]白暴力,白瑞雪.斯拉法价格体系分析[J].长春:当代经济研究,2011(01):9-17.
[41]Garegnani P. Quantity of Capital[M].Capital theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1990:1-78.
[42]Hahn, Frank H.. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics.[M].Oxford: Basil Blackwell.1984:53.
[43]Schefold B. Relative Prices as a Function of the Rate of Profit: a Mathematical Note[J]. Journal of Economics, 1976, 36(1): 21-48.
[44]Schefold B. Reswitching as a Cause of Instability of Intertemporal Equilibrium[J]. Metroeconomica, 2005, 56(4): 438-476.
[45]Han Z, Schefold B. An empirical Investigation of Paradoxes:Reswitching and Reverse Capital Deepening in Capital Theory[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2006, 30(5):737-765.
[46]Schefold B. A Comment on ‘The Measurement of Prices of Production’by Peter Flaschel, Reiner Franke & Roberto Veneziani[J]. Review of Political Economy, 2012, 24(3): 437-444.
[47]Schefold B. Approximate Surrogate Production Functions[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2013, 37(5): 1161-1184.
[48]Shaikh A. Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: the Humbug Production Function[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1974: 115-120.
[49]Zambelli S. The 40% Neoclassical Aggregate Theory of Production[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2004, 28(1):99-120.
[50]Zambelli S. The Aggregate Production Function is NOT Neoclassical[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2017, 42(2):383-426. |
2019, Vol. 287 
